Sample review

A sample review, exactly as ROMURE writes it.

One kitchen and one bathroom sheet, reviewed end to end. Every finding carries the same four parts: where it is, what it is, why it matters, and what to do next.

Sample — illustrative project

Read the review framework

This is a static published sample, so there is no file to download from this page. In a live review the report downloads from the project itself and carries your sheets, your measurements and your jurisdiction. No customer project is reproduced here and no real customer is represented by these numbers.

How to read it

Five classifications, no jargon.

Classification says what should happen to an issue. It is deliberately separate from how serious the issue is, so a quiet drawing gap never gets dressed up as danger.

  • Must Resolve Correct it before it is built

    Supported by evidence in the package, and not something to leave to site.

  • Warning Confirm it before it is fixed

    Drawn consistently, but outside what works in use or worth a second look.

  • Design Consideration Decide it deliberately

    A choice that will be lived with. Best practice, not a requirement.

  • Needs Clarification Ask before assuming

    The drawings do not yet say. ROMURE states the question instead of guessing.

  • Verified OK Checked, and clear

    What was verified is shown too, so you can see the checks that passed.

The findings

Five findings on a two-sheet sample.

Select a finding to move to it on the drawing. The green pin is the check that came back clear.

A-201 Level 01 general arrangement — sample review
5 findings Evidence gated
Apartment floor plan for the sample review, carrying five numbered findings pins: a bathroom door clash with the vanity, a tight island clearance, a hob landing space, a sink missing from the schedule, and a verified clear circulation route.

Findings

Must Resolve · Usability

Bathroom door swings into the vanity

The 700 mm door leaf and the 900 mm vanity occupy the same floor area once the door is fully open, so the door cannot open flat against the wall. On site this is discovered as rework — a different vanity depth, a re-hung door or a relocation — rather than a drawing change.

SheetA-204 Bathroom detail
LocationBathroom, door leaf against the west wall
Door leaf700 mm
Vanity900 mm, adjacent to the door swing
BasisMeasured spatial evidence and drawing coordination
Standards basisNone applied — no verified clause matched to this condition
Ask your designer

Can the vanity move 150 mm clear of the door swing, or can the door be re-hung to open outward?

Exact location

“Somewhere in the bathroom” is not a finding.

Findings arrive pointing at a place on a named sheet. Finding 1 resolves to a detail sheet, a wall, and a door leaf size — not a paragraph you have to translate.

A-204 Bathroom setting out — finding 1 location
Must Resolve
Bathroom plan detail locating finding 1: the door leaf and the 900 mm vanity unit, with the door swing crossing the vanity footprint.
Finding 1 on A-204. The door swings across the vanity footprint; the vanity is dimensioned at 900 mm and the leaf at 700 mm.

What each finding carries

A classification, a plain-language explanation, the measured value, the sheet and the place on it, and the single next action or question. Where a verified standard applies, its basis is named; where none does, the finding says so rather than borrowing authority it does not have.

Consequence is judged separately

A finding never declares itself critical. Escalation to the Critical badge needs separate verified life-safety evidence — so “Mandatory correction” and “dangerous” stay different sentences.

Standards in this sample

What was checked against a verified pack — and what was not.

ROMURE reports the coverage gap as plainly as the finding. In this sample the verified pack is narrow, and most of it could not be evaluated from these two sheets.

Review summary — sample Sample data
JurisdictionDubai, UAE — confirmed
Verified pack availableDubai Building Code 2021 — kitchen subset
Domains coveredKitchen spatial planning, kitchen accessibility
Checks applied0 evaluated · 7 not evaluated from these sheets
Verified OK checks0
Coverage statusActive partial — not complete coverage
Kitchen-only, and within the kitchen only the encoded spatial-planning and accessibility checks. Fire and life safety, plumbing, electrical, ventilation, materials, doors and glazing, appliance installation and professional guidance are not started. A narrow verified pack is reported, not hidden.
  • ✓
    Verified OK means checked against a verified sourceNot “probably fine”. Either a verified clause or a measured factual check passed, or the item is not listed as verified at all.
  • ?
    Not evaluated is a coverage statement, not a passThe sheets did not contain the facts an encoded check needed. ROMURE says so instead of quietly returning clear.
  • !
    Basis is named only when it is realFour of the five sample findings rest on drawing evidence. None of them borrows a code clause to sound more authoritative.

See the full classification and basis framework

The report

What you take away.

The report is written for the decision in front of you, in the order you would act on it — and it keeps the coverage limits attached.

ROMURE Review Sample package
Sample

Review summary

1 Must Resolve
Package: Sample — kitchen and bathroom Jurisdiction: Dubai, UAE (confirmed)
0Critical
1Must Resolve
1Warnings
1Design Considerations
1Needs Clarification
1Verified OK

Findings are ordered by what should be corrected first, then what to confirm, then what to decide. Each one lists the sheet, the location, the measured value and the basis it rests on. Checks that passed are listed with them, so the review shows what was verified as well as what failed.

Run this on your own sheet

No file is served from this page — the published sample is static. This button is the placeholder for the live download in a real review, and it is deliberately not wired to fabricated report data.

The report always keeps the caveat attached

ROMURE reviews interior drawings for coordination, dimension and usability issues. It does not replace your architect, engineer or local authority approval, and a standards line only ever appears where a verified pack applied.

About this sample

Every drawing, measurement and finding on this page is illustrative and built for publication. No customer project, name or drawing is reproduced, and nothing here is a claim about a real review.

Now with your drawings

Put one of your own sheets through it.

The sample is published to be read. The review is built to be run — on a sheet you already have open.

No payment is taken on this page. The sample above is illustrative, not a customer review.